Competitive Technologies

The Adventus Group continues to protect the unique value of our proprietary and patented remediation technologies. These span the soil, sediment, and groundwater environments. By using in-house resources and partnering with best-in-class complementary enterprises, we continue to build out an exciting portfolio of field-proven technologies for the future. Our team of professionals intentionally did not replicate the business model of others, who mainly seek to charge exorbitant prices on the back of weakening science, and poor customer support. Instead, we intend to compete with a different kind of business model—one that insists on providing engineers, consultants, site owners and regulators with cost effective and permanent remedies.

Information is provided under the links listed below comparing Adventus Group products to the claims/performance of other competing products. High-technology industries are tough places to do business, yet we look forward to working with you, and your clients, today and in the years ahead.  Thank you for your business and your continued support.

• Hydrogen Equivalents: Comparison of Simple Electron Donors to EHC™ IN SITU Chemical Reduction (ISCR) Reagent (JAN2008)
• 2007 North American Environmental Remediation Product Innovation of the Year Award: Analysts Report (JUN2007)
• Rebuttal Regarding Regenesis EHC-O™ Claims (MAY2007)
• Comparative Analysis by ERM: Contaminant Removal Mechanisms Under Reduced Environment (MAR2007)
• Comparative Analysis by GeoSyntec: EOS versus ZVI (JAN2007)
• EHC-M Comparative Analysis by Shaw Environmental: Biological Treatment of Hexavalent Chromium (DEC2006)
• Comparative Analysis by Shaw Environmental: Enhanced Bioremediation and ZVI Treatability Testing for 1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorethene, Trichloroethene and Daughter Products (MAR2005)
• Comparative Analysis by CH2M Hill’s Applied Services Laboratory: EHC versus EOS Emulsified Soy Oils (FEB2005)

For additional information, please contact the Adventus Group.